> Hi,
> 
> I get a segafult in decl_maybe_in_construction_p during function versioning.  
> We have following steps in clone creation (e.g. as in 
> create_version_clone_with_body):
>  1. Create function decl
>  2. Create clone of cgraph node
>  3. Copy function body
> After the first step there is no body attached to function and 
> DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION for new decl is NULL.  It is initialized on the third 
> step.  But on the second step get_polymorphic_call_info may be called for new 
> function; it calls decl_maybe_in_construction_p which assumes 
> DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION already exists.
> 
> I firstly wanted to fix decl_maybe_in_construction_p but then realized 
> cgraph_clone_edge copy indirect_info from the original edge anyway and 
> therefore its computation is not required at all.
> 
> Following patch removes redundant indirect_info computation.  Bootstrapped 
> and regtested on linux-x86_64.  Does it look OK for trunk?

OK, plase also add testcase from 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61800

Thanks,
Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> --
> 2014-08-15  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>
> 
>       * cgraph.h (cgraph_node::create_indirect_edge): Add
>       compute_indirect_info param.
>       * cgraph.c (cgraph_node::create_indirect_edge): Compute
>       indirect_info only when it is required.
>       * cgraphclones.c (cgraph_clone_edge): Do not recompute
>       indirect_info for cloned indirect edge.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.c b/gcc/cgraph.c
> index 370a96a..cb49cdc 100644
> --- a/gcc/cgraph.c
> +++ b/gcc/cgraph.c
> @@ -942,7 +942,8 @@ cgraph_allocate_init_indirect_info (void)
>  
>  struct cgraph_edge *
>  cgraph_node::create_indirect_edge (gimple call_stmt, int ecf_flags,
> -                                gcov_type count, int freq)
> +                                gcov_type count, int freq,
> +                                bool compute_indirect_info)
>  {
>    struct cgraph_edge *edge = cgraph_node::create_edge (this, NULL, call_stmt,
>                                                      count, freq, true);
> @@ -954,7 +955,8 @@ cgraph_node::create_indirect_edge (gimple call_stmt, int 
> ecf_flags,
>    edge->indirect_info->ecf_flags = ecf_flags;
>  
>    /* Record polymorphic call info.  */
> -  if (call_stmt
> +  if (compute_indirect_info
> +      && call_stmt
>        && (target = gimple_call_fn (call_stmt))
>        && virtual_method_call_p (target))
>      {
> diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.h b/gcc/cgraph.h
> index 13c09af..2594ae5 100644
> --- a/gcc/cgraph.h
> +++ b/gcc/cgraph.h
> @@ -915,7 +915,8 @@ public:
>       statement destination is a formal parameter of the caller with index
>       PARAM_INDEX. */
>    struct cgraph_edge *create_indirect_edge (gimple call_stmt, int ecf_flags,
> -                                         gcov_type count, int freq);
> +                                         gcov_type count, int freq,
> +                                         bool compute_indirect_info = true);
>  
>    /* Like cgraph_create_edge walk the clone tree and update all clones 
> sharing
>     same function body.  If clones already have edge for OLD_STMT; only
> diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c
> index c04b5c8..557f734 100644
> --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c
> +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ cgraph_clone_edge (struct cgraph_edge *e, struct 
> cgraph_node *n,
>       {
>         new_edge = n->create_indirect_edge (call_stmt,
>                                             e->indirect_info->ecf_flags,
> -                                           count, freq);
> +                                           count, freq, false);
>         *new_edge->indirect_info = *e->indirect_info;
>       }
>      }

Reply via email to