On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 07:02 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 16:57 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 16:56 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Oleg Endo wrote: > > > > > > > How about the attached .html as a replacement for the current one? > > > > > > > I removed the requirement of setting up a combined tree, as I > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > it makes things much more easy. At least it's been working for me > > > > > > > that way. Is this helpful / OK to commit? > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe a patch is better in this case, instead of the whole .html. > > > > > > > > > > hm no likey, this is simply changing too much and making it > > > > > SH-specific. Also, /usr/local is the default. > > > > > > > > I thought the it would work for other targets by replacing "sh-elf" with > > > > "$TARGET". However, I can't test all of those. Maybe maintainers/users > > > > of other targets can comment on the applicability beyond SH. > > > > I'm afraid that's all I can do for now. > > > > > > I'll pick this up. After all, I'm supposedly the maintainer of > > > that page... thanks. > > > > BTW, I've just noticed that I've duplicated the 'Passing options and > > running multiple testsuites' section mentioned on > > https://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html . Maybe the sim-test page could > > be simply integrated into the test.html page in a stripped down form. > > There's certainly an unexpected disconnect but I think a link > would be better than inlining. > > > Most parts of my description have actually nothing to do with > > sim-testing, but are just one way of setting up a newlib based cross > > toolchain. Maybe that can be put as a cross toolchain example somewhere > > else on the wwwdocs, like https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html > > Sounds like a good idea. BTW, to check out the web pages to > generate patches, see <http://gcc.gnu.org/about.html#cvs>.
I know. It's been in place here for a while. See also my previous wwwdoc commits. I don't know how I got the funny idea to send the .html instead of the patch before ... Cheers, Oleg