On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/22/2014 03:24 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Note that there is a patch waiting for a review that makes us accept !v
for vector v:
Ah, indeed. I still think we might as well treat vectors the same as other
types here.
Ok, now that it is a conscious choice, it feels much safer :-)
Though depending on where exactly this is called, it would be funny if we
warned for !v==-1 but not for !v==true, when the possible values for the
elements of !v are actually {-1,0}. I guess I'll have to test after Marek
commits.
Thanks,
--
Marc Glisse
