So I should just take that particular check out then? James Clarke
> On 25 Aug 2014, at 21:05, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:03 AM, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> wrote: >> Previously, this macro had taken the form 10X0, where X is the minor >> version number, e.g. 1090 for OS X 10.9 Mavericks. However, as of OS X >> 10.10 Yosemite, it should take the form 10XX00, i.e. 101000 for 10.10. > > So, if they continue using the same scheme, I’d prefer to future proof this > (I don’t like software time bombs) so that 10.11.0 works as well as 10.12.0 > and so on. > > We didn’t do this last time, as we were unsure how the numbers would work > out. Now, it is much safer to see what the likely format will be. > > Could you try that? > >> - if (major_vers > 4 + 9) >> + if (major_vers > 4 + 10) > > I think this is the only thing that has to change.
