Re: [C++ RFH/Patch] PR 52892 (and others)

[Jason Merrill]

On 08/26/2014 12:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
the difference, for the latter and for more complex cases, is that
adjust_temp_type calls cp_fold_convert which ends up returning a
NOP_EXPR (eg, build in fold_convert_loc).

Perhaps we should address this in adjust_temp_type, either by ignoring 
the conversion to a canonically equivalent type or by directly changing 
the type of the ADDR_EXPR.

Jason