Ping 2? > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:02 PM > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv > and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc > > Ping? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Wang [mailto:tony.w...@arm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:15 PM > > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > > Subject: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the fmul/fdiv and > > dmul/ddiv function in libgcc > > > > Step 2: Mark all the symbols around the fragment boundaries as function > > symbols, so as to generate veneer > > when the two section is too far away from each other. Also, I have both > > manually and using some test cases to > > verify that IP and PSR are not alive at such point. > > > > gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog: > > 2014-8-21 Tony Wang <tony.w...@arm.com> > > > > * config/arm/ieee754-sf.S: Expose symbols around fragment > > boundaries as function symbols. > > * config/arm/ieee754-df.S: Same with above > > > > BR, > > Tony
libgcc_mul_div_code_size_reduction_2.diff
Description: Binary data
