On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote: > On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote: > >I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect, > >it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup. > > I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and > error-prone > (not undoable of course but unnecessarily complicated). And with current > (crippled) > version Joost already got 100% test time improvement.
But if there are jobs that just take 1s to complete, then clearly it doesn't make sense to split them off as separate job. I think we don't need 100% even split, but at least roughly is highly desirable. Jakub