Yes, I had seen that, and the failure is expected. AFAICT the test is correct;
but the implementation of vld[234] is incorrect on bigendian, because of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810 .
HTH, Alan.
Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 9 September 2014 12:19, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8 September 2014 11:35, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawre...@arm.com> wrote:
This adds a test of all the variants of vld2, vld2q, vld3, vld3q, vld4, and
vld4q. These all use typexNxM structs and the OI/CI/XImode mechanism, so the
test cross-checks this against plain ol' vst1(q?).
Cross-tested on aarch64-none-elf (passing), also on aarch64_be-none-elf
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810).
Hi Alan,
On my side, your new test fails at execution on aarch64_be-none-elf:
http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/215072/report-build-info.html
This seems strange since you tested it too.
I am using the Foundation Model.
Christophe.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/aarch64/vldN_1.c: New test.
OK /Marcus
