On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Marc Glisse wrote: > > > > > I don't know what kind of test you have in mind, so I added a runtime > > > test. I > > > am just guessing that it probably fails on alpha because of PR 58757, I > > > can't > > > test. Computing d+d may be even more likely to trigger potential issues, > > > if > > > that's the goal. > > > > Yes, a runtime test. I don't think there should be an xfail without it > > actually having been tested to fail (and then such an xfail should come > > with a comment referencing the bug filed in Bugzilla). > > Would it be ok with the attached testcase then? (same ChangeLog).
Yes, OK with that test. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com