From: tbsaunde <tbsaunde@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> Hi,
should be obvious changing things within an assert is a bad idea, but somehow I forgot :( tested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and commited as obvious. Trev gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-09-12 Trevor Saunders <tsaund...@mozilla.com> * hash-table.h (gt_pch_nx): Don't call gt_pch_note_object within an assert. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@215216 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/hash-table.h | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index c048672..5b27aa8 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2014-09-12 Trevor Saunders <tsaund...@mozilla.com> + + * hash-table.h (gt_pch_nx): don't call gt_pch_note_object within an + assert. + 2014-09-12 Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> * target.def (libgcc_floating_mode_supported_p): New hook. diff --git a/gcc/hash-table.h b/gcc/hash-table.h index c2a68fd..028b7de 100644 --- a/gcc/hash-table.h +++ b/gcc/hash-table.h @@ -1598,8 +1598,9 @@ template<typename D> static void gt_pch_nx (hash_table<D> *h) { - gcc_checking_assert (gt_pch_note_object (h->m_entries, h, - hashtab_entry_note_pointers<D>)); + bool success ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED + = gt_pch_note_object (h->m_entries, h, hashtab_entry_note_pointers<D>); + gcc_checking_assert (success); for (size_t i = 0; i < h->m_size; i++) { if (hash_table<D>::is_empty (h->m_entries[i]) -- 2.1.0