On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > All the updates sound good. > >> Regtested on x86_64-linux, without the patch toplevel make -k check >> took 8hrs3minutes (don't have time data for that run), > > This confuses me, but, no matter. Isn’t 8hrs time data? :-) > >> patch toplevel make -j48 -k check took: >> real 40m21.984s >> user 341m51.675s >> sys 112m46.993s >> and with the patch make -j48 -k check took: >> real 32m22.066s >> user 355m1.788s >> sys 117m5.809s > > These numbers are useful to try and ensure the overhead (scaling factor) is > reasonable, thanks.
A nice improvement indeed. The patched result is 15 times faster than the serial unpatched run. So there is room for improvement (I wouldn't say the scaling factor is reasonable - with accounting for overhead I'd expect it should be possible to arrive at a factor of 32 here at least). So - where's the "serial" parts of the testing run? Thanks for the improvements btw! Richard. >> Is this version ok for trunk? > > Ok. > > Thanks for all your work.