Am 17.09.2014 um 15:14 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Am 17.09.2014 um 00:03 schrieb James Greenhalgh:
>> If you have any other suggestions, or if "=&r" is actually correct and
>> I am misreading the documentation please let me know.
>
> with this patch I see a lot of ICEs in the testsuite for test cases built with
> -O3 (and a build defaulting to -fstack-protector-strong by default), all of
> the
> form:
I tested with the wrong patch. No regression, and fixing the original issue with
the attached patch. Tested with the trunk and the Linaro 4.9 branch,
Matthias
--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
@@ -4031,7 +4031,7 @@
(unspec:PTR [(match_operand:PTR 1 "memory_operand" "m")
(match_operand:PTR 2 "memory_operand" "m")]
UNSPEC_SP_TEST))
- (clobber (match_scratch:PTR 3 "&r"))]
+ (clobber (match_scratch:PTR 3 "=&r"))]
""
"ldr\t%<w>3, %x1\;ldr\t%<w>0, %x2\;eor\t%<w>0, %<w>3, %<w>0"
[(set_attr "length" "12")
