On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:56:03AM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 15/09/14 10:46, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Hmm, I wonder if arm_override_options should reject neon + (arch < 7).
> 
> Is this more to your taste?

Is this really such a good idea? It causes carnage throughout the
testsuite if you have configured with support for Neon and the testcase
is written with dg-options for a pre-armv7-a -march value.

For example in:
  testsuite/gcc.target/arm/di-longlong64-sync-withhelpers.c 

Which forces -march=armv5.

Perhaps you just have to fix the effective-target-ok tests - but then
we lose swathes of test coverage.

Thanks,
James

> 
> Andrew
> 
> P.S. arm_override_options was renamed in 2010.

> 2014-09-15  Andrew Stubbs  <a...@codesourcery.com>
> 
>       * gcc/config/arm/arm.c (arm_option_override): Reject -mfpu=neon
>       when architecture is older than ARMv7.
> 
> Index: gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/config/arm/arm.c      (revision 215228)
> +++ gcc/config/arm/arm.c      (working copy)
> @@ -2845,6 +2845,9 @@
>  
>    arm_fpu_desc = &all_fpus[arm_fpu_index];
>  
> +  if (TARGET_NEON && !arm_arch7)
> +    error ("target CPU does not support NEON");
> +
>    switch (arm_fpu_desc->model)
>      {
>      case ARM_FP_MODEL_VFP:

Reply via email to