On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:56:03AM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 15/09/14 10:46, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > Hmm, I wonder if arm_override_options should reject neon + (arch < 7). > > Is this more to your taste?
Is this really such a good idea? It causes carnage throughout the testsuite if you have configured with support for Neon and the testcase is written with dg-options for a pre-armv7-a -march value. For example in: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/di-longlong64-sync-withhelpers.c Which forces -march=armv5. Perhaps you just have to fix the effective-target-ok tests - but then we lose swathes of test coverage. Thanks, James > > Andrew > > P.S. arm_override_options was renamed in 2010. > 2014-09-15 Andrew Stubbs <a...@codesourcery.com> > > * gcc/config/arm/arm.c (arm_option_override): Reject -mfpu=neon > when architecture is older than ARMv7. > > Index: gcc/config/arm/arm.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/config/arm/arm.c (revision 215228) > +++ gcc/config/arm/arm.c (working copy) > @@ -2845,6 +2845,9 @@ > > arm_fpu_desc = &all_fpus[arm_fpu_index]; > > + if (TARGET_NEON && !arm_arch7) > + error ("target CPU does not support NEON"); > + > switch (arm_fpu_desc->model) > { > case ARM_FP_MODEL_VFP: