On 26/09/14 23:42 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tested on aarch64-suse-linux, where try_cpu=generic.
Andreas.
* configure.host: Use host_cpu, not try_cpu, to define default
abi_baseline_pair.
---
libstdc++-v3/configure.host | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/configure.host b/libstdc++-v3/configure.host
index a12871a..abfd609 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/configure.host
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure.host
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ case "${host}" in
abi_baseline_pair=x86_64-linux-gnu
;;
*)
- if test -d ${glibcxx_srcdir}/config/abi/post/${try_cpu}-linux-gnu; then
- abi_baseline_pair=${try_cpu}-linux-gnu
+ if test -d ${glibcxx_srcdir}/config/abi/post/${host_cpu}-linux-gnu;
then
+ abi_baseline_pair=${host_cpu}-linux-gnu
fi
esac
case "${host}" in
Is this definitely right?
If someone builds a target such as alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu then
try_cpu will be set to alpha by the first case in that file, and so it
will use the alpha-linux-gnu baseline file today, but with your change
it would try to use a alphaev68-linux-gnu baseline file which doesn't
exist.
Would a safer change be to just add a new pattern for aarch64?
--- a/libstdc++-v3/configure.host
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure.host
@@ -345,6 +345,9 @@ case "${host}" in
x86_64)
abi_baseline_pair=x86_64-linux-gnu
;;
+ aarch64)
+ abi_baseline_pair=aarch64-linux-gnu
+ ;;
*)
if test -d ${glibcxx_srcdir}/config/abi/post/${try_cpu}-linux-gnu; then
abi_baseline_pair=${try_cpu}-linux-gnu