Hi!
Just to stress the new testcases some more, I've enabled the
vec_perm_const{32hi,64qi} patterns.
Got several ICEs in expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1,
on the final gcc_unreachable () in the function. That function
is only called if it couldn't be broadcasted in a single insn,
which I believe for TARGET_AVX512BW must be always possible.
Shall I look at this, or do you plan to address this in the near future?
2014-10-03 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* config/i386/sse.md (VEC_PERM_CONST): Add V32HI and V64QI
for TARGET_AVX512BW.
--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2014-09-26 10:33:18.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2014-10-03 15:03:44.170446452 +0200
@@ -10386,7 +10386,8 @@ (define_mode_iterator VEC_PERM_CONST
(V8SI "TARGET_AVX") (V4DI "TARGET_AVX")
(V32QI "TARGET_AVX2") (V16HI "TARGET_AVX2")
(V16SI "TARGET_AVX512F") (V8DI "TARGET_AVX512F")
- (V16SF "TARGET_AVX512F") (V8DF "TARGET_AVX512F")])
+ (V16SF "TARGET_AVX512F") (V8DF "TARGET_AVX512F")
+ (V32HI "TARGET_AVX512BW") (V64QI "TARGET_AVX512BW")])
(define_expand "vec_perm_const<mode>"
[(match_operand:VEC_PERM_CONST 0 "register_operand")
Jakub
