Ping.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: > Ping. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> I also ran the gcc testsuite with >> RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts=-mcopyrelocs" to check for issues. The only >> test that failed was g++.dg/tsan/default_options.C. It uses -fpie >> -pie and BFD ld to link. Since BFD ld does not support copy >> relocations with -pie, it does not link. I linked with gold to make >> the test pass. >> >> Could you please take another look at this patch? >> >> Thanks >> Sri >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On 06/20/2014 05:17 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >>>>> Index: config/i386/i386.c >>>>> =================================================================== >>>>> --- config/i386/i386.c (revision 211826) >>>>> +++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy) >>>>> @@ -12691,7 +12691,9 @@ legitimate_pic_address_disp_p (rtx disp) >>>>> return true; >>>>> } >>>>> else if (!SYMBOL_REF_FAR_ADDR_P (op0) >>>>> - && SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (op0) >>>>> + && (SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (op0) >>>>> + || (TARGET_64BIT && ix86_copyrelocs && flag_pie >>>>> + && !SYMBOL_REF_FUNCTION_P (op0))) >>>>> && ix86_cmodel != CM_LARGE_PIC) >>>>> return true; >>>>> break; >>>> >>>> This is the wrong place to patch. >>>> >>>> You ought to be adjusting SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P, by providing a modified >>>> TARGET_BINDS_LOCAL_P. >>> >>> I have done this in the new attached patch, I added a new function >>> i386_binds_local_p which will check for this and call >>> default_binds_local_p otherwise. >>> >>>> >>>> Note in particular that I believe that you are doing the wrong thing with >>>> weak >>>> and COMMON symbols, in that you probably ought not force a copy reloc >>>> there. >>> >>> I added an extra check to not do this for WEAK symbols. I also added a >>> check for DECL_EXTERNAL so I believe this will also not be called for >>> COMMON symbols. >>> >>>> >>>> Note the complexity of default_binds_local_p_1, and the fact that all you >>>> really want to modify is >>>> >>>> /* If PIC, then assume that any global name can be overridden by >>>> symbols resolved from other modules. */ >>>> else if (shlib) >>>> local_p = false; >>>> >>>> near the bottom of that function. >>> >>> I did not understand what you mean here? Were you suggesting an >>> alternative way of doing this? >>> >>> Thanks for reviewing >>> Sri >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> r~