Ping.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> I also ran the gcc testsuite with
>> RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts=-mcopyrelocs" to check for issues.  The only
>> test that failed was g++.dg/tsan/default_options.C.  It uses -fpie
>> -pie and BFD ld to link. Since BFD ld does not support copy
>> relocations with -pie, it does not link. I linked with gold to make
>> the test pass.
>>
>> Could you please take another look at this patch?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sri
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/20/2014 05:17 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>>>> Index: config/i386/i386.c
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- config/i386/i386.c        (revision 211826)
>>>>> +++ config/i386/i386.c        (working copy)
>>>>> @@ -12691,7 +12691,9 @@ legitimate_pic_address_disp_p (rtx disp)
>>>>>               return true;
>>>>>           }
>>>>>         else if (!SYMBOL_REF_FAR_ADDR_P (op0)
>>>>> -                && SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (op0)
>>>>> +                && (SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (op0)
>>>>> +                    || (TARGET_64BIT && ix86_copyrelocs && flag_pie
>>>>> +                        && !SYMBOL_REF_FUNCTION_P (op0)))
>>>>>                  && ix86_cmodel != CM_LARGE_PIC)
>>>>>           return true;
>>>>>         break;
>>>>
>>>> This is the wrong place to patch.
>>>>
>>>> You ought to be adjusting SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P, by providing a modified
>>>> TARGET_BINDS_LOCAL_P.
>>>
>>> I have done this in the new attached patch, I added a new function
>>> i386_binds_local_p which will check for this and call
>>> default_binds_local_p otherwise.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note in particular that I believe that you are doing the wrong thing with 
>>>> weak
>>>> and COMMON symbols, in that you probably ought not force a copy reloc 
>>>> there.
>>>
>>> I added an extra check to not do this for WEAK symbols. I also added a
>>> check for DECL_EXTERNAL so I believe this will also not be called for
>>> COMMON symbols.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note the complexity of default_binds_local_p_1, and the fact that all you
>>>> really want to modify is
>>>>
>>>>   /* If PIC, then assume that any global name can be overridden by
>>>>      symbols resolved from other modules.  */
>>>>   else if (shlib)
>>>>     local_p = false;
>>>>
>>>> near the bottom of that function.
>>>
>>> I did not understand what you mean here? Were you suggesting an
>>> alternative way of doing this?
>>>
>>> Thanks for reviewing
>>> Sri
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> r~

Reply via email to