On 25 September 2014 21:30, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:33:17AM -0700, Michael Collison wrote: >> The problem is the "CONST_INT 0", not a large constant. This constant is >> not accepted by the predicate, but is accepted by the constraint. > > Yes, bad choice of words, sorry. Just read "big" as "not matching the > predicate". The point is that everything works fine until RA, and that > makes it hard to make a useful test. >
Hi, IIUC, a testcase is not required/practicable. So, may I ping this patch? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02209.html Thanks, Christophe. > > Segher > > > p.s. Please don't top-post. Thanks.