On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:27:09PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > this patch fixes Alan's issue with IMPLICIT followed by ";". I am not > sure whether using the _eos machinery is really needed ??? especially as > "!" seem to be already handled. > > Additionally, I missed the inner "[...]" for the new: > > R563 implicit-stmt is IMPLICIT implicit-spec-list > or IMPLICIT NONE [ ( [ implicit-none-spec-list ] ) ] > > > Namely, "IMPLICIT NONE ()" is also valid - but was rejected before. As > implicit-none-spec implies type,* that's now also handled. > (* "An IMPLICIT statement specifies the mapping for the letters in its > letter-spec-list. IMPLICIT NONE with an implicit-none-spec of TYPE or > with no implicit-none-spec-list specifies the null mapping for all the > letters.") > > And finally, Dominque correctly observed that the location of some of > the error messages was rather off, e.g. if there was a long comment > following the actual statement. Hence, I have modified the code to > provide a better error message. > > Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux. > OK for the trunk? >
Looks ok to me. -- Steve
