On Oct 15, 2014, at 2:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 15/10/14 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day. > > One reason for doing that replacement is that I keep copying existing > tests and then having to change it, and I'm lazy!
Lazy is fine, doing 1000 instead of 500 is only a hair more work when we do them all in mass. I like constancy, so I actually prefer not changing them (til all are changed).
