On 10/17/2014 06:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:15:11PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 10/17/2014 05:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Plus if you add misalign tests...
Sure, can do this on Monday.
Ok, thanks.
- bool use_calls = ASAN_INSTRUMENTATION_WITH_CALL_THRESHOLD < INT_MAX
- && asan_num_accesses >= ASAN_INSTRUMENTATION_WITH_CALL_THRESHOLD;
+ bool use_calls
+ = ASAN_INSTRUMENTATION_WITH_CALL_THRESHOLD < INT_MAX
+ && (flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_KERNEL_ADDRESS)
+ && asan_num_accesses >= ASAN_INSTRUMENTATION_WITH_CALL_THRESHOLD;
I agree that original code didn't quite match GNU conventions but can we
avoid reformatting it to make future backports easier? So e.g.
bool use_calls = ASAN_INSTRUMENTATION_WITH_CALL_THRESHOLD < INT_MAX
+ && (flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_KERNEL_ADDRESS)
&& asan_num_accesses >= ASAN_INSTRUMENTATION_WITH_CALL_THRESHOLD;
I can live with that. So here is updated patch:
Thanks, LGTM.
-Y