"Jeff Law" <l...@redhat.com>: >On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote: >> The additional source must have the same requirement >> crossmodule-indircall-1.c has. >> >> * crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement. >Why? When used by crossmodule-indircall-1.c we'll have already tested >the marker and when used by itself, it does nothing.
>So I don't see why you think a marker is needed for this source file. When configuring --disable-lto it gets compiled twice: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
