On 22/10/14 14:53 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:Only if it's likely to catch problems in future. If you'd be putting it in only to make a testcase fail then it's not worth it.No, since I think with this patch _M_current is clearly valid when being dereferenced.You could even simplify it further using std::prev: if (_M_is_word(*std::prev(__pre))) __left_is_word = true;Done.
OK to commit, thanks!
