On 10/22/14 15:11, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/22/2014 10:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
These tools currently require GNU extensions - something I probably
ought to fix if we decide to add them to the gcc build itself.
Would these be more appropriate in binutils?
I don't think so, given that we don't need any piece of regular
binutils. There's no meaningful way to build libbfd. It would be strange
to build binutils and have everything that's normally part of it
disabled at configure time.
Fair enough, but I'm having trouble seeing these in GCC. Makes me
wonder if they ought to be a package unto themselves, nvptxtools or
somesuch.
Note that as a separate package, you don't have to remove the GNU
extensions :-)
jeff
