On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This patch fixes PR63664 and PR63574. Problem is in NULL types for labels > not handled by ICF properly. I assume it is OK for labels to have NULL type > and added check into ICF rather then fixed label generation. > > Bootstrapped and checked on linux-x86_64. OK for trunk?
Instead it shouldn't be called for labels instead. Richard. > Thanks, > Ilya > -- > gcc/ > > 2014-10-28 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkov...@intel.com> > > PR ipa/63664 > PR bootstrap/63574 > * ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compatible_types_p): Allow NULL > args. > > gcc/testsuite/ > > 2014-10-28 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkov...@intel.com> > > PR ipa/63664 > * gcc.dg/ipa/pr63664.C: New. > > > diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c b/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c > index 1369b74..afc0eeb 100644 > --- a/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c > +++ b/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c > @@ -169,6 +169,11 @@ bool func_checker::compatible_types_p (tree t1, tree t2, > bool compare_polymorphic, > bool first_argument) > { > + if (!t1 && !t2) > + return true; > + else if (!t1 || !t2) > + return false; > + > if (TREE_CODE (t1) != TREE_CODE (t2)) > return return_false_with_msg ("different tree types"); > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr63664.C > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr63664.C > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..31d96d4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr63664.C > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > + > +class test { > + public: > + test (int val, int *p) > + { > + int_val = *p; > + bool_val = (val != int_val); > + } > + > + ~test () > + { > + if (!bool_val) > + return; > + } > + > + int get_int_val () const { return int_val; } > + > + private: > + bool bool_val; > + int int_val; > +}; > + > +static int __attribute__ ((noinline)) > +f1 (int i, int *p) > +{ > + test obj (i, p); > + return obj.get_int_val (); > +} > + > +static int __attribute__ ((noinline)) > +f2 (int i, int *p) > +{ > + test obj (i, p); > + return obj.get_int_val (); > +} > + > +int > +f (int i, int *p) > +{ > + return f1 (i, p) + f2 (i, p); > +}