On 10/29/2014 11:58 AM, Phil Muldoon wrote: > My archaeology into the source repository has not revealed why > we needed bootstrap. Perhaps we included it out of a sense of > paranoia for testing. I've CC'd Tom on this, so he may have an > opinion or insight. From my point of view, I see no value in > bootstrapping libcc1 now. It's not a required build to bootstrap GCC.
Then I agree, I don't think it needs to be bootstrapped. Paolo
