> From: Nathan Sidwell [mailto:nathanmsidw...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Nathan Sidwell > > It's not an error to omit it for complex - but of course means something > different. IMHO it would be confusing to set type to integer_type_node > when > that's definitely wrong. But then setting 'defaulted_int' when that's not > the > case is also confusing.
Oh in that case the patch is incomplete. Currently a complex alone gives an error at compilation which is why I added -fpermissive to the testcase. The patch don't change this behavior. Best regards, Thomas
