> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > make check for gcc passed > > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> The results are the same for Silvermont. > >> There are no significant changes on Haswell. > >> So I agree with Richard, let's enable this x86 wide. > >> > >> Bootstrap/ passed. > >> Make check in progress. > >> Is it ok? > >> > >> 2014-10-25 Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com> > >> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Increase > >> PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS. > > Let's wait for Honza's approval ...
Looking through the emails, it is not clear to me if you re-tested that this still makes the intended speedup with the tree-level loop peeling? (comitted 2014-10-14). If it still works as intended, I do not think we have any reason to not change the default in params.def given that even ARM folks are calling for peeling by default. Honza > > Uros.
