On 11/06/2014 02:05 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote:
In any case, if we want abstract origins to have this field set
correctly in abstract origins, we need to have the possibility to
modify it after IPA.
My point is we don't need the abstract origins at all - they are a DWARF
bytecode space optimization.
I suppose that's mostly true, but it's also good for expressing the
relationship between functions and their inlined/cloned variants, which
some consumers might take advantage of. And optimization is always
good, especially one we're already doing; our DWARF is big enough as it is.
Jason
