On 12 November 2014 14:46, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/14 13:06, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 12 November 2014 04:50, Yangfei (Felix) <felix.y...@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Michael Collison
>>>> <michael.colli...@linaro.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch that removes extraneous comment attached.
>>>>>
>>>>> The CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO macro is hard coded to return 32. For
>>>>> the vector intrinsic vclz this is incorrect and should return the
>>>>> value
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> vclz_{s,u}8 ...
>>>>
>>>>> eight. The CTZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO has the same issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The patch is ok . Sorry about the delay in reviewing this.
>>>>
>>>> Ramana
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Can anybody backport this patch for the 4.8/4.9 branch? They have
>>> the same issue too. Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can take care of the backport, provided a maintainer such as Ramana
>> approves it first.
>>
>> The original PR (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63365)
>> is against 4.9.2, but the bug was present in 4.8 too.
>>
>> OK to backport it to 4.8 and 4.9?
>>
>
> Ok by me unless an RM objects in the next 24 hours.
>
Committed:
- 4.9 branch: r217488.
- 4.8 branch: r217490.
> Ramana
>
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christophe.
>>
>
