On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2014-10-21 12:06 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > ... > I'd prefer symbolic constants for dont_delay. Also the address can contains > other parts, e.g. index for some targets. It is not necessary to change the > code but a comment would be nice that right now it is oriented for machine > with base+disp only addressing. > > Although it is probably matter of taste. So you are free to commit it > without any change. I'll add an enum with symbolic constants for dont_delay and a comment about handled memory address types. Thanks for the review! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.linaro.org
