On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Good. To be clear, not having carefully analyzed whatsoever, my point was > more about changing _M_end too, to non-const, than about not touching > _M_begin. Would that make sense?
Currently we never mutate _M_end. I *believe* that we still won't in the future, since _M_end is not as volatile as _M_begin. -- Regards, Tim Shen
