> -----Original Message----- > From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 11:08 PM > To: Terry Guo; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: ger...@pfeifer.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] Update 5.0 changes.html with Thumb1 UAL > > > On 18/11/14 02:48, Terry Guo wrote: > > + <ul> > > + <li> The Thumb-1 assembly code are now generated in unified syntax. > The new option > > + <code>-masm-syntax-unified</code> can be used to specify whether > inline assembly > > + code are using unified syntax. By default the option is off which > means > > + non-unified syntax is used. However this is subject to change in future > releases. > > + Eventually the non-unified syntax will be deprecated. > > + </li> > > + </ul> > Hi Terry, > > Sorry for the late comment, I see this has already been committed. > > I think it should be "assembly code is now generated". > Also "whether inline assembly code is using unified syntax". > > Kyrill
Thanks for comments. I committed below patch to fix those typos. BR, Terry Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.39 diff -u -r1.39 changes.html --- htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html 19 Nov 2014 12:13:00 -0000 1.39 +++ htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html 20 Nov 2014 03:48:26 -0000 @@ -387,9 +387,9 @@ <h3 id="arm">ARM</h3> <ul> - <li> The Thumb-1 assembly code are now generated in unified syntax. The new option + <li> The Thumb-1 assembly code is now generated in unified syntax. The new option <code>-masm-syntax-unified</code> can be used to specify whether inline assembly - code are using unified syntax. By default the option is off which means + code is using unified syntax. By default the option is off which means non-unified syntax is used. However this is subject to change in future releases. Eventually the non-unified syntax will be deprecated. </li>