On November 22, 2014 12:24:22 PM CET, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote: >> Yeah, but after a couple of pings for a generic change, we went the >target >> way. > >That's a bit of a shame, the 400 -> 100 change was very likely tested >only on >x86-64 and nevetheless applied to the generic code, so the fix >repairing the >damages should also be applied to the generic code.
A patch to bump the generic limit is OK. Targets that dont want it can reduce it in target specific code. Richard.
