On 11/24/2014 01:55 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
in this rejects-valid, as part of build_user_type_conversion_1,
standard_conversion is called by implicit_conversion with a *null* expr,
thus the condition in standard_conversion
/* [conv.ptr]
A null pointer constant can be converted to a pointer type; ... A
null pointer constant of integral type can be converted to an
rvalue of type std::nullptr_t. */
if ((tcode == POINTER_TYPE || TYPE_PTRMEM_P (to)
|| NULLPTR_TYPE_P (to))
&& expr && null_ptr_cst_p (expr))
conv = build_conv (ck_std, to, conv);
is false and the snippet is rejected. Should we pass a nullptr_node as
expr in such cases, ie, when handling conversions functions returning
std::nullptr_t?!?
I'd prefer to change the test quoted above to not require expr to be
non-null in the case of NULLPTR_TYPE_P.
Jason