On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> The testcase shows that when expanding ARRAY_REF from a const static var
> with initializer that contains COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR, we can try to expand
> COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR even when modifier is not EXPAND_INITIALIZER (it is
> EXPAND_SUM in that testcase, but could be many others).
> While gimplification should get rid of all the compound literal exprs
> for automatic compound literals, COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR for static compound
> literals can survive in the initializers, thus this patch handles them
> always.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok.  (I wonder if the fallthru still makes sense or if we should
hit a gcc_unreachable () for other uses of COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR).

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2014-11-26  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR middle-end/64067
>       * expr.c (expand_expr_addr_expr_1) <case COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR>:
>       Handle it by returning address of COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR_DECL
>       not only if modifier is EXPAND_INITIALIZER, but whenever
>       COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR_DECL is non-NULL and TREE_STATIC.
> 
>       * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr64067.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/expr.c.jj     2014-11-18 08:26:45.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/expr.c        2014-11-26 17:38:52.877675088 +0100
> @@ -7677,11 +7677,13 @@ expand_expr_addr_expr_1 (tree exp, rtx t
>        break;
>  
>      case COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR:
> -      /* Allow COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR in initializers, if e.g.
> -      rtl_for_decl_init is called on DECL_INITIAL with
> -      COMPOUNT_LITERAL_EXPRs in it, they aren't gimplified.  */
> -      if (modifier == EXPAND_INITIALIZER
> -       && COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR_DECL (exp))
> +      /* Allow COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR in initializers or coming from
> +      initializers, if e.g. rtl_for_decl_init is called on DECL_INITIAL
> +      with COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPRs in it, or ARRAY_REF on a const static
> +      array with address of COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR in DECL_INITIAL;
> +      the initializers aren't gimplified.  */
> +      if (COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR_DECL (exp)
> +       && TREE_STATIC (COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR_DECL (exp)))
>       return expand_expr_addr_expr_1 (COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR_DECL (exp),
>                                       target, tmode, modifier, as);
>        /* FALLTHRU */
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr64067.c.jj  2014-11-26 
> 17:37:37.835865797 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr64067.c     2014-11-26 
> 17:37:02.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* PR middle-end/64067 */
> +
> +struct S { int s; };
> +int *const v[1] = { &((struct S) { .s = 42 }).s };
> +
> +int *
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  return v[0];
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer, HRB 21284
(AG Nuernberg)
Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany

Reply via email to