will wait for Andrey this time
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:10:15PM +0400, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> That would be an option too. I don't know whether it is much better or not. >> Kernel lives without constructors, they are used only by coverage. And >> coverage does not need priorities. So it is only kasan that needs >> priorities. That would be a plenty of code in lib/module.c only for >> kasan... > > If you change it, we can revert the gcc change. > >> Meanwhile here is backport to 4.9. Applied w/o conflicts (not counting >> ChangeLog). >> >> OK to commit to gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_9-branch ? > > Ok. > > Jakub
