On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > On 12/11/2014 03:03 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> In PR64146, for position independent code IPA ICF should be more careful >>> about thunk creation. >>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-pc and no new regression was seen. >>> >>> Ready for thunk? >> >> >> Hmm, does that merge the functions but >> keep a call to the original alias which can be overridden at runtime? >> >> If so, ok. > > > Hello. > > No, in this case there's no merge operation processed. > Function are going to remain as they are. > > I hope such behavior is the right one.
It's certainly conservative. Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Martin > > >> >> Thanks, >> Richard. >> >>> Thank you, >>> Martin > >
