On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 03:03:39PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > The compilation of convert-bfp-6.c itself is identical between the older
> > > (where
> > > it didn't fail) and newer (where it fails) builds, what has changed is
> > > libgcc.a.
> > > In particular, what matters is libgcc/bid_binarydecimal.o.
> > > If I link all objects from libgcc from older (good libgcc) but
> > > bid_binarydecimal.o
> > > (that one from newer bad libgcc), convert-bfp-6 still aborts, if I link
> > > all objects
> > > from libgcc from newer (bad libgcc) but bid_binarydecimal.o (that one from
> > > older good libgcc), convert-bfp-6 works.
> >
> > I see. If it is not a false alarm, then it seems to me that
> > gcc-15-2212-gad642d2c950
> > from Jeff might fix the problem from the regression report. But I am not
> > sure if it
> > really fix the problem or happen to be right.
> Based on Jakub's comment, I'm going to assume it's a real issue related to
> the compilation of the support code in libgcc and thus I need to do another
> round of trying to reproduce.
The testcases don't fail for me anymore, 20240722 (around 20:45 UTC) still
failed, 20240726
(around 13:15 UTC) already didn't. Don't have record of exact revisions.
Jakub
