On Feb 28, 2005, at 6:40 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
"Although maintaining a development branch, including merging new changes fromThis is wrong. There is no limit on how long a development branch may need to live.
the mainline, is somewhat burdensome, the absolute worst case is that such a
branch will have to be maintained for four months."
But it is documented on our own web site: http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
I want to say this branch has been tested more and touch less than most
developmental branches in the past. In fact the tree-ssa is a werid case
and really is not the normal in terms of gcc developmental branches.
-- Pinski
