Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes: > Looking at your suggestion makes me realize that my suggestion is too > complicated. It's not necessary to generate the combinatorial > explosion at all. We can always keep cc0 setters and cc0 users in > separate instructions. The key is to keep them from getting > disconnected, and the key to that is to indicate which instructions > clobber the condition codes (i.e., most of them).
Sorry, of course that is not true, but I'll still send a description for a new proposal. Ian
