Joe Buck wrote:
Daniel Berlin wrote:
IE if we added a very large warning to the submission page that said
"PLEASE NOTE: BY SUBMITTING A TESTCASE, YOU AGREE THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT
TO CREATE, USE, AND PUBLISH EITHER YOUR VERBATIM TESTCASE OR A
DERIVATIVE UNDER GCC'S CURRENT LICENSE"
or something of the sort, they would be very hard pressed to win in a
real lawsuit in court.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 05:21:02PM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
I think that would be a goof ides, I would say GPL explicitlty, since
several different licenses are used in GCC.
Freudian slip? It seems that this may well be a "goof idea".
Then we can't accept any test cases from free software that has a
GPL-incompatible license. Our only requirement for a testcase is that it
can be distributed with gcc, and that modified forms can also be
distributed. It is a mistake to try to be more strict, or to specify
either "GPL" or "GCC's CURRENT LICENSE".
true enough, so more care is needed in the language here
