Kazu Hirata wrote: > >I would like to propose that the c4x port be obsoleted for 4.0. > >... > > The primary reason is that the port doesn't build.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:44:38PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I'm unpersuaded by the arguments later in the thread that we should keep > this port for its pedagogical value as a BITS_PER_UNIT != 8 port. I > think the criteria should be the same as any other port. > > However, I do think that it's late to be making this decision, and I > can't see any harm in delaying obsoletion until 4.0.1. That will give > potential maintainers a fair chance to step forward. But if it won't even build, then users should be warned.
