----Original Message----
>From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
>Sent: 12 April 2005 15:40
>> "Yes, since the fix was in the top level. I have already closed at
>> least two binutils PRs about this as FIXED - searching for product ==
>> binutils, subject containing install, state containing RESOLVED would
>> have shown them."
>
> I didn't realise looking here would actually give me the fix, or I'd
> have looked. Sorry. I've only noticed the comments about the fixes.
No problem, it's just a bit of advice that I thought was generic to enough
situations to bear repeating: if you've got a bug, always check the
bugzilla, because someone might have already found it and if you're lucky
they'll even have fixed (or at least explained) it.
> Thanks for the explanation. I think I've bumped into a relative
> path problem before
Yes, I remembered you tend to be building on Solaris, and I think it's
particularly on Solaris that this bug has manifested - most other systems
supply their own install utility, and so the gcc build system never ends up
needing to use the subsitute script.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
