On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Gareth Pearce wrote:
So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles and
runs fine on gcc 3.3.
Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to stack
overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3. Trivial work around is
to move the specific declaration above the template definition. Now I see
potential for this to be 'the way the standard wants it to be', but given I
don't have a copy of the standard I am unsure.
Should I report this as a bug or is it a standards compliance improvement?
This is a standards compliance improvement as x is not dependent so the function
call to recurse has to be looked up of the available functions at decoration
time of the template function.
The easy way is to fix your code is to add:
int recurse(const sstring_t& blah);
before declaring the template version.
Thanks, Andrew Pinski
