On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Apr 14, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > >>Does this bug look familiar? 20629 is ICEing in the same spot, but > >>it looks like theirs was reproducible after preprocessing. Is there > >>any more information that I provide that would be helpful? I've > >>attached the command line, specs and a stacktrace from cc1plus. > > > >I think this was fixed on the mainline by: > >2005-03-18 Dale Johannese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * cp/tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle SSA_NAME. > > Yep, and I didn't put it in the release branch. Bad Dale. OK to do > that? > > If this is the same problem, changing the VN hashtable size to 1 > should make it show up reproducibly. >
The released 4.0.0 successfully compiles the code that was having problems before. -nick
