On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > The main case i've hit so far is DECL_CONTEXT, which is also > DECL_FIELD_CONTEXT, and my current thinking is that in a FIELD_DECL will > be only accessible through DECL_FIELD_CONTEXT (unless we want to > "re-merge" these two fields again and throw it in the common part, and > always call it DECL_CONTEXT).
This particular case wouldn't bother me. r~
