On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 02:14 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | While moving FIELD_DECL to it's own substruct, the following questions
> | have come up. I figured one of you might know:
> |
> | 1. Do we need DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on FIELD_DECL? I can't think of a
> | place where we would actually try to *output* a FIELD_DECL directly, but
> | maybe i've missed something. I ask because the C frontend tests
> | decl_assembler_name on field decl, but never sets it on them.
>
>
> What happens when you have this (in C++)
>
> namespace foo {
> union {
> int baz;
> double foobar;
> } bar;
> };
>
I tried this, and it still doesn't access DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME of
FIELD_DECL.
> ?
>
> -- Gaby