On May 24, 2005, at 12:01 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
Use of bare 'inline' is just plain wrong in our source code; this has nothing to do with C++, no two C compilers implement bare 'inline' alike. Patches to add 'static' to such functions (AND MAKING NO OTHER CHANGES) are preapproved, post-slush.
That will not work for the cases where the bare 'inline' are used because they are external also in this case. Now this is where C99 and C++ differs at what a bare 'inline' means so I have no idea what to do, except for removing the 'inline' in first place.
Thanks, Andrew Pinski
