Paul Brook wrote: > I thought the x86 sin/cos intrinsics were unsafe. ie. they don't gave > accurate > results in all cases.
If memory serves, Intel's fsin (for example) has an error > 1 ulp for value flose to multiples of pi (2pi, for example). Now, I'm not certain this is true for the K8 and later Pentiums. Looks like I need to run another round of tests. ;) ..Scott
