Haren Visavadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | --- Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Vincent Lefevre writes: | > | > | Other solutions that would fix the bug (but not | > ultimate solutions): | > | 1) Do not claim that gcc is a conforming ISO C | > implementation. | > | > As far as I can see, there is no such claim. | | It's implied when using -std=c99
I see. Patch to reword the documentation are welcome. -- Gaby